Real Madrid could face correctional action for culminating a La Liga adjudicator of corruption as the war against match officers continues.
WHAT HAPPENED?
The Spanish titans transferred an explosively articulated letter to the Spanish Football Federation(RFEF) following their 1–0 defeat to Espanyol, expressing frustration over officiating opinions. Madrid, who dominated possession and committed just three fouls compared to Espanyol’s 14, saw their opponents admit only two unheroic cards throughout the game. Ultimately, a late thing from Romero sealed Madrid‘s defeat, further fueling their dissatisfaction.
THE BIGGER PICTURE
While several La Liga clubs, including Real Sociedad and Alavés, have raised disgruntlement over officiating norms in the history, Madrid‘s complaint took a more serious turn. Unlike routine examens of negligence or inconsistency, Los Banos went a step further by professing that arbiters were laboriously manipulating matches against them. This direct attack on the integrity of the refereeing system has drawn sharp review from La Liga authorities, raising pressures between the club and league officers.
WHAT TEXAS SAID?
La Liga chairman Javier Tebas was quick to respond, mocking Real Madrid for their outburst. He labelled them a” crying club” and took a poke at club chairman Florentino Pérez, describing his leadership as” oligarchic.” He had preliminarily advised that any sanctioned allegations of corruption would not go unpunished. In line with that station, La Liga submitted a formal complaint against Madrid two weeks alone, egging farther action from the league’s governing bodies.
DID YOU KNOW?
According to reports from Cadena Cope, the correctional Committee is now preparing to launch a disquisition into Madrid‘s allegations. The commission will have a timeframe of six weeks to two months to assess the claims and determine whether any corrective measures should be imposed. However, they will recommend applicable warrants, which could range from forfeitures to implicit conduct against Madrid‘s board members who were involved in drafting the letter, If the commission concludes that correctional action is warranted.
