‘shame on you’: Sreesanth’s spouse slams Lalit Modi, Clarke for reviving IPL’s slapgate video after 17 years
Seventeen years after one of the maximum infamous moments in IPL records, the ‘slapgate’ controversy is back in the highlight. This time now not due to players, but on account of a selection by using former IPL chairman Lalit Modi and ex-Australia captain Michael Clarke.
On their Beyond23 Cricket Podcast, the duo aired formerly unseen photos of Harbhajan Singh slapping S Sreesanth after a Mumbai Indians vs Kings XI Punjab suit in 2008.
The incident, which had left Sreesanth in tears on the sector, resulted in Harbhajan being banned for the rest of the season. over time, both gamers reconciled, frequently revealing that the problem used to be buried. Sreesanth himself has publicly stated that Harbhajan apologised a couple of times, and the 2 have moved forward in their private lives and careers.
Sreesanth’s wife tackle slapgate video
but the resurfacing of the video hasn’t take a seat nicely with Sreesanth’s wife, Bhuvneshwari Sreesanth, who took to Instagram to sentence Modi and Clarke for reopening old wounds. ‘shame on you @lalitkmodi and @michaelclarkeofficial. You human beings are not even human to tug up something from 2008 only for your personal reasonably-priced exposure and perspectives. each @sreesanthnair36 and Harbhajan have lengthy moved on, they’re fathers now with faculty-going kiddies, and but you try and throw them again into an vintage wound. certainly disgusting, heartless, and inhuman,’ she wrote.
In a follow-up publish, she expressed how the video’s launch affects their circle of relatives.
‘@sreesanthnair36 has rebuilt his lifestyles with dignity and beauty after every trouble he faced. As his spouse, and as the mom of his infants, it is deeply painful for our family to peer this resurface after 18 long years. families are being pressured to relive trauma that used to be buried many years ago only so you can chase views. this doesn’t just hurt the players, it scars their harmless toddlers who now have to face questions and disgrace for no fault of theirs.’
She introduced a harsh rebuke, ‘You need to be sued for doing some thing so reasonably-priced and inhumane. Sreesanth is a man of energy and man or woman, and no video can take that dignity away from him.
She introduced a harsh rebuke, ‘You ought to be sued for doing some thing so cheap and inhumane. Sreesanth is a man of energy and man or woman, and no video can take that dignity faraway from him. fear God before you harm families and innocent babies on your personal advantage.’
